Responding to the Mujasima who argue that 'Ilm Al-Kalam is an impermissible discipline, and that its conclusions cannot be used as a basis for belief
Some claim that the very disagreement between the various ideologies is proof that they’re all false. This article offers a brief response to this.
A more appropriate way to deal with those who deny the existence of the extra-mental physical world, by arguing that it is possible for it to be all a dream, or a virtual illusion, or something similar.
Responding to those who argue that the indecisiveness of each singular testimony supporting a mass transmitted report, entails that the mass transmitted report be itself indecisively reliable.
Distinguishing intrinsic truths from extrinsic ones, and arguing against the transformation of realties.